Gun Laws And 2a
Delta Force legend Larry Vickers says the Army has an ammo problem
Delta Force legend Larry Vickers says the Army has an ammo problem
📅
✍️By ZRIntel Editorial Team📍Washington, D.C.
Master Sgt. (ret.) Larry Vickers spent 20 years in Army Special Forces, with 15 of those years in the elite Delta Force. Throughout his career, Vickers engaged in combat operations across various global hotspots including Panama, Desert Storm, Somalia, and Bosnia—deployments documented for public knowledge only. He served as a combat marksmanship instructor during his tenure and, post-retirement, transitioned into a firearms industry consultant, contributing significantly to renowned projects such as the Heckler & Koch HK416, a weapon now favored by U.S. Special Operations.
When Vickers states that the Army is experiencing an ammunition crisis, professionals in the field should take heed. In an article titled “The Caliber Cluster” published by Firearms Friday, he critiques the Army’s approach to small arms and ammunition, declaring it an “absolute train wreck.” His insights highlight critical logistical challenges that could impair military effectiveness in sustained conflicts.
Vickers scrutinizes the Army's reliance on the 5.56mm and 7.62mm NATO rounds, labeling these widely standardized cartridges as aging and deficient. The 5.56mm, while functional, suffers from limitations in stopping power, and the 7.62mm is hampered by its weight. Conversely, Vickers challenges the Army's enthusiasm for the 6.8x51mm cartridge, citing a troubling lack of existing supply infrastructure and questioning the feasibility of its implementation in combat scenarios.
"Good luck with that transition in a war zone," he quips, underscoring the unpredictability of battlefield logistics.
Turning his focus to long-range ammunition, Vickers highlights Delta Force’s experimentation with the 6mm ARC caliber—boasting superior ballistics compared to its predecessors while offering reduced recoil. However, he admits that adopting such niche cartridges complicates logistical operations. He further mentions the adoption of the 6.5mm Creedmoor under the Army’s Mid-Range Gas Gun program, praising its performance but lamenting the additional logistical demands it imposes.
The breadth of calibers currently in use by the Army expands to .300 Blackout for SOF squads, .50 BMG for heavy machine guns, as well as 9mm for sidearms. There’s even discussion around utilizing the .338 Norma Magnum for enhanced range capabilities. This eclectic assortment of ammunition, Vickers warns, adds layers of complexity to supply chains.
Many of the Army’s weapons systems, such as the M4, M249, and M240, remain stagnant in terms of innovation, contributing further to logistical strife. Vickers recognizes some advancements, particularly the Sig Sauer NGSW rifle, but reiterates the persistent challenges in achieving compatibility across various combat platforms.
Citing historical precedents, Vickers reflects on World War II logistics, noting that the German forces struggled with a myriad of incompatible weapon calibers, which severely limited their operational fluidity. In contrast, the U.S. military’s strategic approach back then relied on just four primary calibers, which significantly simplified resupply across fighting fronts.
Vickers proposes a potential remedy for what he describes as the Army’s ammunition mess: standardizing on a maximum of two calibers—5.56mm for short-range engagements and 6.8mm for other scenarios—while phasing out redundant options. He advocates for a focus on modularity, envisaging a paradigm shift towards fewer platforms with interchangeable components.
Advocacy for simplicity could resonate across departments, potentially easing operational burdens for supply chains and logistics personnel. Vickers’s analysis encapsulates the ongoing dialogue around military procurement and logistics challenges; a dialogue underscored by his practical insights coupled with historical context.
The implications of Vickers's recommendations extend beyond mere operational efficiency; they challenge the current logic underpinning military logistics. As supply chain dynamics continue to evolve and given the rapid pace of technological advancements, a streamlined ammunition inventory could be critical. While some may argue for the inclusion of innovative calibers, practicality might dictate otherwise. The efficacy of combat operations hinges on logistical efficiency, which should lead policymakers to heed Vickers's call for simplification. Current trends suggest that unless the Army adapts to manage its myriad ammunition types, they risk operational effectiveness in prolonged engagements.