Gun Laws And 2a
Gun Rights Groups Ask Supreme Court to Overturn Cook County Assault Weapons Ban
Second Amendment advocates push high court to review Illinois restrictions, citing nationwide implications
📅
✍️By ZRIntel Editorial Team📍Chicago, IL
Two national gun rights organizations the Firearms Policy Coalition and the Second Amendment Foundation have formally petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down Cook Countys long-standing ban on assault-style weapons. Their legal challenge comes amid renewed debate over firearms regulation following recent mass shootings, and it has the potential to affect not only Illinois statewide ban but also similar laws across the country. The petition, filed Wednesday, directly contests the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals decision earlier this year. The appellate court had reaffirmed its prior rulings upholding bans on semiautomatic rifles and large-capacity magazines, citing both the Cook County ordinance and comparable laws in other jurisdictions. In 2019, the 7th Circuit confirmed that such prohibitions did not contravene the Second Amendment, and subsequent appeals were declined by the Supreme Court. Cook Countys prohibition, formally known as the Blair Holt Assault Weapons Ban, was originally enacted in 1993 and later named for a Chicago teenager killed while protecting a classmate in a 2007 shooting. The ordinance bans the possession, acquisition, and transfer of over 125 specifically listed rifles, including the AR-15. Local courts consistently upheld the measure, pointing to its targeted scope and the countys compelling public safety interests. The current case is more complex due to overlapping state and local restrictions. In January 2023, Illinois enacted the Protect Illinois Communities Act, a statewide law that mirrored many of Cook Countys provisions while extending restrictions on detachable magazines and other features associated with semiautomatic firearms. Plaintiffs argue that Illinois new law, coupled with Cook Countys ban, represents a sweeping infringement on citizens Second Amendment rights. Supporters of the lawsuit argue that the Supreme Courts 2022 Bruen decision which established that modern firearm laws must align with the nations historical tradition of regulation provides new grounds for reconsideration. They contend that the bans target weapons in common use for lawful purposes, including home defense and sport shooting. Firearms Policy Coalition President Brandon Combs emphasized this point, stating: The AR-15 is the most popular rifle in America, owned by millions of peaceable people for lawful purposes every day. The Bill of Rights is not a suggestion, and the Second Amendment is not a second-class right. Opponents of overturning the ban, including Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul, argue that the laws are carefully crafted responses to mass shootings and fall well within constitutional boundaries. They stress that the regulations do not prohibit all firearms but rather limit access to weapons disproportionately used in mass casualty events. Advocates for the bans cite data from tragedies like the Highland Park Fourth of July parade shooting, where an AR-15-style rifle was used to fire 83 rounds in under a minute, killing seven and wounding 48 others. The legal landscape remains unsettled. While the 7th Circuit has been consistent in supporting such restrictions, the Supreme Court has repeatedly declined to review challenges to assault weapons bans in Illinois, Maryland, and Rhode Island. However, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch have expressed interest in addressing the issue, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh suggesting that the Court may eventually resolve the question in the near term. If the Court grants review, the case could clarify whether bans on semiautomatic rifles with certain features are permissible under the Second Amendment. Such a ruling would reverberate far beyond Cook County and Illinois, potentially shaping the legality of assault weapons bans across the United States.