Industry WatchGun Laws And 2a
Navigating the Origins of Crime Guns: Key Insights from Everytown's Report
New Report Names Top Cities Where Crime Guns Originate
📅
✍️By ZRIntel Editorial Team📍Houston, Texas
Original Article
New Report Names Top Cities Where Crime Guns Originate
Source: Smoking Gun
View original articleEverytown for Gun Safety Support Fund published a significant report titled "Straight to the Source" that highlights the top U.S. cities serving as sources for crime guns. This comprehensive analysis relies on city-level crime gun trace data from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), identifying 25 cities where licensed gun dealers sold the most firearms later linked to criminal activities between 2017 and 2021. The findings show that these dealers tied to 209,748 guns illustrate about 14% of all crime-related recoveries in the country. Notably, Houston ranks first as the leading source of crime guns, with 22,799 traced firearms.
The report underscores the unfettered access that the public has had to detailed data regarding the gun dealers linked to crime, particularly after Congress restricted ATF from releasing such trace data. The report demonstrates that certain cities, while having numerous licensed dealers, still contribute disproportionately to crime gun totals, suggesting that a few bad actors are likely responsible for the bulk of these recoveries. A stark example highlighted is Jonesboro, Georgia, a small city with only around 4,000 residents, but ranking 11th in crime guns, attributed to transactions from a singular dealer.
In examining trafficking trends, the report discusses 'time-to-crime' (TTC), defining it as the period between a firearm's sale and its recovery during a crime. Median TTC values significantly below the three-year threshold typically indicate trafficking, with evidence suggesting many firearms are found with individuals other than the original purchasers, hinting at illegal resale or straw purchasing practices. The findings show an alarming trend where, in state data associated with these source cities, half of the recovered crime guns were sold by dealers located close to where they were later found, with many sold within a mere 10 miles of their recovery point.
The report casts a spotlight on the crucial role that licensed gun dealers play in curbing the illegal gun market. It stresses the importance of improving gun dealer oversight and proper identification of suspicious sales patterns. Furthermore, it identifies specific dealers whose activities warrant closer examination, emphasizing that with the cessation of the ATF monitoring program, state and local authorities must step in to manage oversight effectively.
This report arrives at a significant time amidst a national dialogue on gun control and public safety. Understanding the origins of crime guns aids local communities and lawmakers in crafting informed policies to combat gun trafficking and reduce gun violence. Notably, the data challenges the common misconceptions that population size correlates directly to crime gun prevalence, thereby shifting the focus to identifying and regulating individual dealers who participate in trafficking activities. The implications are clear: local governments must reclaim their authority and responsibility to oversee gun sales and ensure that their regulations catch up with the evolving landscape of gun trafficking.
With stakeholders advocating for tighter regulations and accountability, this report serves as a resource that informs public safety discussions and policy decisions. The increase in state-level regulations, along with this actionable intelligence, suggests a shift in how communities might approach firearm transactions in an effort to mitigate risks associated with crime. Local leaders must take heed of the highlighted trends and potential for abuse to safeguard their constituents and communities from violence.
This report from Everytown signals a critical awakening regarding the sources of crime guns, emphasizing the urgent need for local oversight amid federal regulatory rollbacks. Key takeaways revolve around the identified poor practices among specific dealers that fuel illegal trafficking, alongside a stark reminder of the importance of regulatory vigilance. As communities grapple with the implications of these trends, it is paramount for local authorities to fortify their regulations and build frameworks to hold these dealers accountable. What remains unclear is how communities will bridge the gap left by diminished federal oversight; closer scrutiny at the local level is crucial in this evolving landscape.