Gun Laws And 2a
Subcommittee tables bill to cut Virginia concealed‑carry permit fee
Subcommittee tables bill to cut Virginia concealed‑carry permit fee
📅
✍️By ZRIntel Editorial Team📍Virginia
On October 12, the House Committee on Public Safety's firearms subcommittee convened to discuss House Bill 1569, a proposed measure aimed at reducing the concealed handgun permit fee in Virginia from its current rate of $50. This bill was presented by Del. Delaney Wiley, who outlined the components of the fee: $10 each for the circuit court clerk and local law enforcement background checks, $5 allocated for the Virginia State Police, and $25 directed to the FBI for fingerprint processing. However, the context for this discussion reveals a significant change; in 2012, the General Assembly eliminated the fingerprinting requirement for concealed carry permits, meaning that the $25 earmarked for the FBI was no longer necessary. According to Wiley, the intention behind HB 1569 is to adjust this fee to accurately reflect the costs moving forward, eliminating the portion that is no longer relevant. The bill found both supporters and opponents during the committee discussion. Advocates, including notable representatives from the Virginia Citizens Defense League and the National Rifle Association, argued that the current fee does not align with what many localities charge, stressing the need for fees to reflect actual processing costs. Resident William Barrett from Arlington emphasized that the bill transcends partisan boundaries, stating, "This is not a Democrat or Republican or pro-gun or anti-gun bill. Its about aligning with what it actually costs to process these permits." Conversely, opponents of the bill raised concerns regarding the implications of reducing the cost. Critics such as Andrew Goddard from the Virginia Center for Public Safety highlighted that the fees are designed to cover the processing and enforcement costs tied to the permit system. Goddard pointed out, "This is not a tax on gun owners. This is to pay for the cost of processing," indicating that reduced fees might impair the ability to fund necessary oversight and administration activities. Additionally, Lori Haas stressed that numerous licensing fees within the Commonwealth remain significantly higher due to the inclusion of additional requirements, such as training or medical evaluations. After deliberations and public testimony, a motion was made to lay the bill on the table, effectively halting it from progressing at this stage. The subcommittee voted 6 to 3 in favor of the motion, meaning that the bill will not be moved forward for further consideration in its current form. Nevertheless, the chair of the subcommittee noted that there remains the possibility for the full committee chair to exercise discretion by pulling these types of bills for a complete hearing, should the circumstances warrant it. In this political climate, discussions around firearms legislation continue to be painstakingly nuanced, reflecting a mixture of advocacy and caution. The fate of legislation like HB 1569 serves as a bellwether for broader sentiments around gun rights and regulatory approaches.